Why are so many LGBTQ Hindus pro-Trump?

#HindusForTrump

USAHindus4Trump@gmail.com

@USAHindus4Trump 

Does anyone remember back in 2012 when the United Nations was unable to pass resolutions against the murder and persecution of LGBTQs worldwide because the 57-nation Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) walked out of the talks and Pakistan described homosexuality as “licentious behaviour”? Does anyone remember how classes on LGBTQ history were canceled in a Birmingham England school because the Muslim community protested? Does anyone remember when the BBC canceled its "Free Speach" debate about gay Muslims when the Mosque in which it was to be held opposed? Does anyone remember how Hillary Clinton was against gay marriage until it became statistically popular, then she became pro-gay marriage? Did you as an LGBTQ Hindu or a friend of LGBTQ Hindus notice how silent the Left was and is about this Islamic and Leftist homophobia? What if there was an Organization of Christian Cooperation who opposed LGBTQ rights in the United Nations? What if there was an Organization of Hindu Cooperation who opposed LGBTQ rights in the United Nations? Would the Left remain silent? No! At least those elements of the Right who are opposed to gay marriage (and not all of them are, increasingly more aren't) are principled enough to stand by their beliefs even when and if gay marriage becomes popular... they are not hypocrites who go where the wind blows when it comes to LGBTQs.

The fact of the matter is that many many LGBTQ Hindus see how silent the Left is when it comes to Islamic atrocities against LGBTQs, such as routinely throwing them off buildings, when they are not silent about homophobia in Christianity and when it does appear, inside Hindutva. In India there is the term "pseudo-secular", this is meant to call our the Leftist practice of being selective as to where they place their criticism when it comes to issues like LGBTQ rights and respect for women. If they see it in Hindutva or in Christianity in the West, they attack, but Islam ALWAYS gets a free pass. Why is this? Because Islam is too barbaric and backward to be a full world power, yet, and so they are weaker than more progressive nations and so the Left likes to use them as "victims". If you can't rise to the top because your society abuses minorities and shuns secularism, then no matter what you do, no matter how cruel and evil you are, the Left is there to champion you on the world stage. 

In the West, among the White Left, this is because White Leftists have not experienced Islamic persecution and atrocities, their issue has been more with Christianity. Because they have been at odds with Christianity, it is ok for world Leftism to be anti-Christian, but because the White Left has not experienced Islamic persecution on LGBTQ grounds, then it is not ok to criticize Islam for this. Rest assured, if White Leftists had been harassed by Islam then yes, anti-Islam would be a popular thing. It is not the White Left's friends who are being hunted and killed, it is Brown people... Brown on Brown violence does not count as much in their eyes, only White on White social conflict matters. Brown Hindus are supposed to be against the White Conservatives who are the enemy of the Left, but White Leftists are not supposed to be the enemies of Brown Muslims who persecute liberal Hindus. The Brown Left is not anti-Islam simply because they are copying the White Left who remain the true leaders of the Leftist global movement. Brown Leftists are auto-racist, they won't defend their own race from LGBTQ attacks because the White Left doesn't... and they are also racist because of their lowered expectations for their own race... only Whites are expected to be evolved, Brown Muslims are never expected to grow on the LGBTQ issue. 

Does anyone remember when Trump made the move to decriminalize homosexuality worldwide, and how the Left attacked him for this, making the absurd accusation than while Islamic nations are busy killing gays, the decriminalization was a form of homophobia because it did not YET take the full step of making gay marriage legal? And didn't the Left take its time in getting to legalizing gay marriage? Didn't the Left move piecemeal in liberation LGBTQs? And so why can't the right? Trump was the first President ever to make such a move, and it resonated with LGBTQs worldwide, because for the first time ever, the USA held Islamic nations accountable for their institutionalized homophobia. There is a changing attitude on the Right, and more and more LGBTQs and LGBTQ Hindus especially are jumping ship. 

As for the White and Brown Left's hypocritical attacks on Hindutva for homophobia, they forget to mention that it was not Hindu culture which criminalized homosexuality in India, it was the colonial powers. Prior to Islamic invasion and colonialism, the Hindu culture was not anti-homosexual and was more than tolerant. There is an entire god and religious movement in Hinduism just for transgenders, the cult of Iravan / Aravan, who is worshiped by his transvestite brides. It is outside cultures which have brought homophobia to India, it is not endemic. Rather than attack the root cause of this problem, the Left rather attacks the effect. The RSS (a Hinduish volunteer organization in India) at first came out against homosexuality, but then because of its recognition of the tolerance of Hindu culture, reversed the stance and accepted homosexuality. Hindus are willing to change, but Islam is not. Did the Left highlight the progress of Hindutva? No, they only criticized Hindutva for not moving fast enough, while Islam was not asked to move at all. Hindutva and Hindus are ready to open their eyes to their real culture, but Islam's real culture is anti-homosexual, and always will be. 

The Left does not get to tell LGBTQs and LGBTQ Hindus what they fear more, the eroding homophobia in the right or the Left-Islamic alliance with its Orwellian silence on Islamic homophobia. Isn't it disgusting how Leftist ware those Che Guevara t-shirts, even though he put gays in concentration camps? What if he had done that to Muslims? The Left would never be wearing those shirts. The Left has already proven than in their quest for social destruction they are willing to sacrifice gays, they would allow the Islamization of Western culture, they would allow gays to be persecuted again, as long as their final agenda was met, which is no longer even really social liberalism but tolerance of Islamic homophobia. Guess what, LGBTQs are starting to rather take their chances with the Right who are willing to evolve on this issue then with the Islamo-Left who are creeping into social homophobia by selectively not criticizing Islam for its bigotry and murder of LGBTQs.

The Leftist fake "Hindu" American Foundation pushes Kamala using race politics, again

  

#HindusForTrump

USAHindus4Trump@gmail.com

@USAHindus4Trump

If you have not heard of the Hindu American Foundation, stay away and spread the word they are not Hindu but Leftist traitors. They have been around for more than a decade and push themselves into everything, hogging up the limelight with their ill-gotten Democratic connections on Capital Hill. They try to claim themselves as the largest "Hindu" advocacy group in the USA even though they are universally hated by half of the Hindu community, particularly the substantial right-wing.

We have reported on HAF on this blog before and their anti-Republican, anti-White rhetoric. Back in 2018 HAF attacked a local Fort Bend Texas Republican advocacy group for putting up an ad that featured Ganesh with interpretation of his symbolism, but they presumed to attack the ad for all Hindu because it begged the question “would you worship a donkey or an elephant? The choice is yours.” HAF said the ad was offensive but it really wasn't. First, yes, some Hindus do worship animals, and what of it HAF? They were just trying to look more Western than Westerners. The ad was run in the Indian Herold and the staff had viewed and approved the ad beforehand. All of the complaints came from Democrat Indians who had an agenda. 

During the 2016 election, HAF put up a racist anti-White article called "The Racialization of Religion Began Long Before Today’s Islamophobia" in of course the Huffington Post. The article took aim directly at Trump's then proposal to slow down immigration from particular Islamic theocratic states in the Middle East which were known to harbor large numbers of terrorist organizations and Sharia Law activists. The article completely misrepresented the community's concerns about immigration from Islamic Theocracies by trying to paint the opposition as not being against theocracy but being racist. The article strongly implied that Whites were racializing Islam, that their concerns were not about Sharia Law and infiltration by Islamic terrorists from known danger zones, but simply that Whites were anti-brown racists.  The implication was that this anti-brown racism could spill over into anti-Hinduism.  The Hindu American Foundation hurt the sentiments of Whites and Hindu friends of Whites by implying modern Whites were too ignorant and simply wicked to want to know the difference between race and religion. 

When Hindus For Trump started our campaign, HAF was one of the first Leftist organizations to attack us.  For our logo we copied the BJP's montage of depicting politicians such as Modi seated upon a lotus flower.  When the BJP puts Modi at the center of a lotus it would seem that this is not offensive, however when the person seated in the lotus is Donald Trump, this is deemed inflammatory by the Hindu American Foundation.  HAF sent tweets to our twitter account requesting we change our poster so as not to bring disrepute upon the lotus and om symbol.  Why did HAF single us out for using imagery which has been standard propaganda for the BJP and Hindu politics for years now? This poster was created by nothing but Hindus, HAF had no right to criticize standard Hindu political artwork just because the art now featured Donald Trump.

We are kicking ourselves that we did not download and save the Houston Chronicle's article written by the Hindu American Foundation's National Leadership Council member Kavita Pallod Sekhsaria, because HAF must have changed the article in response to the negative outrage, which was deserved, and now we don't have the original quotes of issue for this blog. The original title of the article was "I'm Hindu. But not like that", and to understand this issue, that title is all you need to know. You can see above we screen captured the original title on HAF's facebook page and you will notice the URL to the article, now titled "I'm Hindu. But I'm also me" still carries the original title. If anyone has the original version of the article please send it to us.

 

Origina URL
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/local/gray-matters/article/I-m-Hindu-But-not-like-that-Opinion-13958155.php

We wish we had the direct quotes, but in the article, HAF made it clear they are disparaging of and don't want to be associated with Hindutva (Hindu Nationalism); just the title, "But not like that", dehumanizing Hindus who support Hindutva. HAF has admitted in their own articles they have no staff who espouse Hindutva politics. Would any group claim to be the largest Jewish advocacy group but say they have no Zionists on their team? Would any group claim to be the premier voice of Islam in American without even one Muslim on their board who believes in Sharia Law? Would any supposedly Catholic organization ever subtly disavow the theocratic nation-state of the Vatican? Would these seemingly distance themselves from theocratic movements within the community?  Would any of these groups ever refer to any section of their coreligionists as "that"? No, they wouldn't, because not only would that be political suicide, it would also painfully reveal that said organizations did indeed absolutely not speak for all of its coreligionists and indeed looked down on many of them, working against them. 

"HAF’s current team spans both the political and religious spectrum, most of whom have a distaste for Indian politics of any sort, and none of whom espouse Hindutva politics." - Sheetal, HAF Senior Director 

"Coalition Against Reality: Deconstructing an Attack on the Hindu American Foundation" Retrieved 6/12/2019 From: https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/omsweetom/2014/01/coalition-against-reality-deconstructing-an-attack-on-the-hindu-american-foundation.html#K6YfZUVOTIKUDzEQ.99

Yet there is another scandal HAF is involved in and that is their alliance with the anti-Hindutva organization Sadhana. There has been a steady and persistent organized movement to establish Diwali as a school holiday in both NYC and New Jersey for decades now. Many of the persons and organizations which have joined this coalition are Hinduists who do support Hindutva, and no one would question this if Zionists or Islamists were involved in similar campaigns for their own community, it's only scandalous when the organizers are Hindutva. HAF was well aware of and invited to join this large coalition which spanned dozens of organizations and thousands of Hindus. However, HAF chose to quietly launch their own separate campaign for Diwali that was not only not purely Hindu (they made it an interfaith movement) but they also engaged with Sadhana, a long mistrusted and contentious anti-Hindutva organization. HAF would, of course, have known that snubbing the already establish Hindu Holidays campaign, and siding with such a scandalous organization like Sadhana, this would alienate and aggravate their Hindu support base in the regions, but again HAF just does not seem to care about their membership and donation pool, it's almost as if they don't need us, HAF even tried to poach our collaboration with the Mayor's Office away from us, whose side are they on?  

As for HAF's chosen partner Sadhana, here is what they have to say about legitimate and respectable Hindutva:

(Images may be blurry on a mobile phone, to read click on the image)

So now it should be no surprise that the Hindu American Foundation has pushed Kamala Harris on their Facebook page. They published an article by CNN on Kamala Harris' Indian roots and why they matter. Kamala Harris stated on the census that she is "African American", not Asian American, and she has rarely made her Indianess as part of her campaign. Kamala Harris' Indian roots only matter because she is using them in a sleazy way to gain Indian and Hindu votes, even though her Hindu mother chose to raise her daughter's Baptists... why didn't Harris go for a hybrid religion and why does she rarely if ever highlight her Hindu heritage? Harris knows if she overemphasized her Indian and Hindu background it could dampen the ardor of the Christain Black community's identification with her who make up a larger proportion of the electorate than Hindus. When it comes to numbers Harris puts certain minorities above others. Not to mention that Harris knows if she emphasized her Hindu roots should could lose the Islamist vote. And Harris is also partially White, yet that is really never mentioned by the Left... and HAF has proven their lowly opinion of Whites. Both Hindus and Whites need to call out HAF on their racialist politics. 

Hindu Indian Supreme Court lawyer says "Kamala Harris A Dangerous Democratic Design"

#HindusForTrump

USAHindus4Trump@gmail.com

@USAHindus4Trump

By Amitabh Sinha - Lawyer at the Supreme Court of India, educationist heading colleges of different universities

The projection of a supposed Indian woman to the highest office in the US is nothing but an eyewash — one that may prove to be detrimental for the Indians living there

India and the United States today are on the same political trajectory. It is the fight to retain the integrity of its people and the war against the dangerous communist-jihadi combine that seeks to dominate the world through dogma, violence and radicalised religion. And just as we have the Congress in India — a pseudo-secular, pro-Muslim party with a history of failed diplomacy in international relations — the US has the Democrats. A party that is well-known for its basically anti-Hindu/pro-Islamic thought and deed. A party that plays on the emotions of the people of the US in the name of liberty and equality, and yet when voted to power, goes against the very nature of its electoral promise. Kamala Harris, or as she is very conveniently Kamala ‘Devi’ Harris now, is the best example of that.

A person of Indian-Jamaican parentage, a member of the Third Baptist Church of San Francisco and wife of entertainment lawyer Douglas Emhoff. A lady who has never laid claim to be Indian until now. Which honestly she isn’t either — she’s as far away from identifying as ‘Indian’ as Joe Biden himself would be.

A mirror-image in India is the brother-sister duo of Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi. Come election time, and they are ready with their temple-tourism, their rudraksha malas and tilaks to denote Hindu roots and a consistent pro-Indian voice that they raise while seeking votes. A diametric change from pre-2014, where all they sought was the vote of specific minorities and appeasement was the name of the game. And yet, every time they have been voted to power, as history has it — they have never hesitated to become agents of communist China, a country that has been viciously anti-India for as long as one can remember.

This is what the Indian diaspora in the US needs to be wary of. Indians, emotional as they are, will choose to vote for what they see as the fulfilment of an aspirational dream — that of seeing one of their own in the highest echelons of power.

But Kamala ‘Devi’ Harris is not that. Slowly and surely, she has started showing her true colours, resonant with her beliefs and political affiliation with the Democrats. Her latest statement on Kashmir where she promises support to ‘Kashmiris’, and talks of intervening if needed, is essentially what is an internal matter of India regarding the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, is telling.

Another Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal had her support when India’s Minister of External Affairs S Jaishankar had refused to meet or attend any function which had her attendance. Jayapal had earlier moved a resolution on the Kashmir issue in the House of Representatives. “It’s wrong for any foreign government to tell Congress what members are allowed in meetings on Capitol Hill,” said Harris in her tweet. But it’s fine to interfere in Kashmir without being asked to, Ms Harris?

Indians in the US should remember that when asked at the Howard University press conference after she placed her bid, whether she identifies as an African-American or an Indian-American, Harris replied that she identifies as “a proud American”.

In the same vein, when she had to list her ancestry on the U.S. Census form, Kamala Harris dropped any ties to her Indian roots and chose instead to be known as “African American” instead of “Asian Indian.” This despite her emotive declaration that the greatest truth in her life is the honour of being Dr Shyamala Gopalan Harris’s daughter. Then why forget her singular contribution in your life Ms.Harris, when pursuing identity politics?

Also, pride in her African-American roots was apparent when she declared her presidency on Martin Luther King Jr Day. Her campaign colours and typography are designed to come across as a tribute to Shirley Chisholm, the first black woman to run for president in 1972.

The truth is that China is desperate. As they see their country headed for disintegration in the near future, they will do anything to further their cause of having a pro-Communist China party at the helm of a government in the US. And the election of Kamala Harris is fitting in just perfectly. Which true Indian living in America would openly support pro-Pakistan Kashmiri Muslims rather than the Kashmiris who were driven out of their homes and land in the worst genocide in recent history, and still remain true to India?

Kamala Harris’s presidential projection as an Indian is wrong on every count. It is designed to garner the support of the hugely successful Indian diaspora in the US. But those Indians need to now believe that they require no one anywhere to validate their position in the country. That they hold a vote that should be cast carefully. Elect a government that will help the US along with India, Japan, Australia and other friendly countries fight the proxy-war that has been unleashed by China and their closest allies — the Jihadi Muslim countries. And any democratic government that dangerously manipulates its voters on a false premise and then betrays them is not the right one.

Indians, beware of the wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Why many USA Hindus are grossed-out by Biden's Kamala pick

#HindusForTrump

USAHindus4Trump@gmail.com

@USAHindus4Trump

Why would Biden choose a candidate who only recently stated that she believed those women who accused him of inappropriate touching and what kind of person is Kamala Harris to then become the running mate of a man she believed had sexually assaulted other women? There is a calculated and sleazy reason why Kamala was chosen as Biden's running mate, and much of this has to do with pandering to Hindus. 

Making only up 1-2% of the population, most people would think that Hindus are not really a major vote bank, and if scattered across the country they could not make up enough of a constituency in any state in order to change an election. But Hindus are not scattered across the country and in fact they have concentrations in swing-states like Florida and Virginia. That is why in 2016 Trump attended a rally just for Hindus, in the non-swing-state of New Jersey, just to speak to these voters. This is why Trump's daughter-in-law went to a Virginia Hindu temple on Diwali, this is why Trump's son Eric went to a Hindu temple in Florida, because in these states the Hindu vote matters. 

Hindus brought Trump Florida and this time they could also bring him Virginia. During the 2016 campaign the Democrats ignored the Hindu community up until the very end when Hillary Clinton's crowd tried a last-ditch effort with "Hindus For Hillary", it didn't even arrive until only weeks or even days before the election, and then only a few nights before there was arranged a puja for Hillary in a Hindu temple, while Pujas had been done for Trump for months beforehand. The Left is generally not interested in Hindus who they are more interested in branding as Hindutva fascists than allies. 

But this time the Democratic party has wisened up to the new power of Hindus, including their monetary wealth... Hindus are the wealthiest religious group in the USA. Hindus donated millions to Trump, along with bringing him the vote, and the Democrats want both. Hindus see in Biden's pick of Kamala Harris an attempt to pander to them, both racially and subliminally spiritually. 

Kamala Harris is the daughter of a Jamaican Christian and an Indian Hindu mother, even though her Hindu mother had her raised in Baptist Churches. In his latest piece for the Toronto Sun (here), liberal activist Tarek Fatah chastised Kamala's sudden reawakening to her Indian roots when she has built much of her career on being Jamaican, or at least that made up the bulk of her rhetoric... Kamala was not until recently known as the first "Indian-American" woman to run for any sort of office, nor did she take much ink to highlight her Hindu heritage. 

But now the Left is very keen to make Kamala look like the first Hindu and Indian-American to ever run for Vice-President... yes Hindus have noticed that this has come all of a sudden... where was Kamala's Hinduness and Indianess when she was running for President... now that she is running as Biden's VP it is everywhere... Hindus are not hallucinating about the sudden change. They have noticed and many are grossed-out.